Back to Articles

Graphql vs gRPC

TL;DR

GraphQL and gRPC are two different technologies that are used in software development to enable efficient communication between different systems. This article discusses the main differences between the two technologies, including their architecture, data formats, and language support. It also explains the pros and cons of using each technology, and compares and contrasts their use cases. Finally, the article provides examples of companies and organizations that have successfully used either GraphQL or gRPC in their systems.

GraphQL and gRPC

GraphQL and gRPC are two different technologies that are used in software development to enable efficient communication between different systems.

GraphQL is a query language and runtime system that is used to build and expose APIs. It allows clients to request only the data they need from an API, and receive that data in a predictable and hierarchical format. This makes it possible for clients to easily access and manipulate the data they receive, without having to deal with multiple endpoints or complex data structures.

gRPC, on the other hand, is a remote procedure call (RPC) framework that uses HTTP/2 as its transport protocol. It allows different systems to communicate with each other by calling methods on a remote server as if they were local, and receiving the results in a language-agnostic way. This makes it possible for systems written in different languages to easily interoperate with each other.

Both GraphQL and gRPC are commonly used in modern software development to enable flexible and efficient communication between different components of a system. They are often used to build APIs that can be accessed by different clients, such as web and mobile applications.

The debate

There is often a debate among developers about whether to use GraphQL or gRPC when building APIs and other types of systems. This debate arises because the two technologies have different strengths and weaknesses, and are better suited to different use cases.

Developers might choose to use GraphQL over gRPC for a number of reasons. For example, GraphQL’s hierarchical data structure and ability to request only the data that is needed make it a good choice for building APIs that are flexible and easy to use. Additionally, GraphQL’s strong type system and built-in support for schema definition and validation make it a good choice for ensuring the quality and consistency of an API.

On the other hand, developers might choose to use gRPC over GraphQL for a number of reasons. For example, gRPC’s use of HTTP/2 and binary data formats makes it a good choice for building high-performance APIs that need to handle a lot of data or traffic. Additionally, gRPC’s support for language-agnostic communication and its ability to generate client and server code from a common interface definition make it a good choice for building APIs that need to be used by systems written in different languages.

Overall, the decision of whether to use GraphQL or gRPC often depends on the specific requirements and goals of a project, and which technology is better suited to meeting those requirements and achieving those goals.

The differences

There are several key differences between GraphQL and gRPC, including their architecture, data formats, and language support.

One of the main differences between the two technologies is their architecture. GraphQL is a query language and runtime system that is typically used to build and expose APIs. It is based on a request-response model, where clients send a query to the server and receive a response that contains only the data that was requested. This makes it possible for clients to easily access and manipulate the data they receive, without having to deal with multiple endpoints or complex data structures.

gRPC, on the other hand, is a remote procedure call (RPC) framework that is used to enable communication between different systems. It is based on a client-server model, where clients call methods on a remote server and receive the results in a language-agnostic way. This makes it possible for systems written in different languages to easily interoperate with each other.

Another key difference between GraphQL and gRPC is their data formats. GraphQL uses a human-readable JSON-based format for its queries and responses, which makes it easy for developers to understand and debug. gRPC, on the other hand, uses a binary data format that is optimized for performance and efficiency, but can be more difficult for developers to work with directly.

Finally, there are differences in the language support provided by the two technologies. GraphQL is designed to be language-agnostic, and can be used with any programming language that has a GraphQL client library. gRPC, on the other hand, is designed to support multiple languages, but requires the use of a code generation tool to generate client and server stubs for each supported language. This can make it easier to use gRPC with multiple languages, but can also add complexity to the development process.

Pros and cons

There are several pros and cons to using GraphQL in software development. One of the main advantages of using GraphQL is its ability to provide flexible and hierarchical data access. Because GraphQL uses a query language and a hierarchical data structure, it allows clients to request only the data they need from an API, and receive that data in a predictable and hierarchical format. This makes it easy for clients to access and manipulate the data they receive, without having to deal with multiple endpoints or complex data structures.

Another advantage of GraphQL is its strong type system and support for schema definition and validation. Because GraphQL uses a schema to define the data types and relationships within an API, it is possible to use that schema to validate queries and responses, and ensure that they conform to the expected structure and format. This can help to ensure the quality and consistency of an API, and reduce the risk of errors or inconsistencies.

However, there are also some potential drawbacks to using GraphQL. One of the main potential drawbacks is the potential for over-fetching and under-fetching data. Because GraphQL allows clients to request only the data they need, it is possible for clients to request too much or too little data, which can lead to unnecessary network traffic and wasted resources. This can be mitigated by using techniques such as batching and caching, but it can still be a potential issue.

Another potential drawback of GraphQL is its relative complexity compared to other API technologies. Because GraphQL uses a query language and a hierarchical data structure, it can be more difficult for developers to understand and work with compared to technologies that use a more traditional REST-based approach. This can make it more difficult to learn and use GraphQL, and can also make it more difficult to debug and troubleshoot issues with a GraphQL-based API.

Overall, the pros and cons of using GraphQL depend on the specific requirements and goals of a project, and whether the benefits of using GraphQL outweigh the potential drawbacks.

The advantages of gRPC

There are several advantages to using gRPC in software development. One of the main advantages of gRPC is its high performance and efficient use of bandwidth. Because gRPC uses a binary data format and HTTP/2 as its transport protocol, it is able to transfer data more efficiently than other technologies, such as REST. This can make it a good choice for building APIs that need to handle a lot of data or traffic, or that need to operate over a low-bandwidth connection.

Another advantage of gRPC is its support for language-agnostic communication. Because gRPC uses a common interface definition language (IDL) to define the methods and data types that are exposed by an API, it is possible to generate client and server code for multiple languages from that IDL. This makes it easy to build APIs that can be used by systems written in different languages, and can help to reduce the complexity of building and maintaining a distributed system.

However, there are also some potential drawbacks to using gRPC. One of the main potential drawbacks is its lack of flexibility compared to other technologies, such as GraphQL. Because gRPC uses a client-server model and a fixed set of methods and data types, it can be more difficult to add or change the functionality of an API without breaking existing clients. This can make it more difficult to evolve an API over time, and can require careful coordination between the API provider and its clients.

Another potential drawback of gRPC is its limited browser support. Because gRPC uses HTTP/2 and a binary data format, it is not directly supported by web browsers, and requires the use of additional libraries or proxies to enable communication between a web client and a gRPC server. This can add complexity to the development process, and can limit the types of clients that can access a gRPC-based API.

Overall, the advantages and disadvantages of using gRPC depend on the specific requirements and goals of a project, and whether the benefits of using gRPC outweigh the potential drawbacks.

The right tool for the right job

There are several key differences between the use cases for GraphQL and gRPC, and these differences can affect which technology is more appropriate for a given project.

One of the main differences between the use cases for the two technologies is their focus. GraphQL is designed to be a query language and runtime system for building and exposing APIs, and is typically used to enable flexible and hierarchical data access. This makes it a good choice for building APIs that need to support a wide range of clients, or that need to enable clients to easily access and manipulate the data they receive.

gRPC, on the other hand, is designed to be a remote procedure call (RPC) framework that is used to enable efficient communication between different systems. It is typically used to build APIs that need to handle a lot of data or traffic, or that need to support multiple languages. This makes it a good choice for building APIs that need to be highly performant, or that need to be used by systems written in different languages.

Another key difference between the use cases for the two technologies is their complexity. Because GraphQL uses a query language and a hierarchical data structure, it can be more complex to learn and use compared to other technologies, such as REST. This can make it more difficult for developers to understand and work with GraphQL, and can also make it more difficult to debug and troubleshoot issues with a GraphQL-based API.

gRPC, on the other hand, can be simpler to use than GraphQL in some cases. Because gRPC uses a client-server model and a fixed set of methods and data types, it can be easier for developers to understand and work with compared to GraphQL. Additionally, gRPC’s support for code generation can make it easier to use gRPC with multiple languages, and can reduce the amount of boilerplate code that needs to be written.

Overall, the use cases for GraphQL and gRPC can vary depending on the specific requirements and goals of a project, and which technology is more appropriate will depend on which technology is better suited to meeting those requirements and achieving those goals.

Real world examples

There are many companies and organizations that have successfully used either GraphQL or gRPC in their systems.

One example of a company that has successfully used GraphQL is Facebook. Facebook uses GraphQL as the primary query language for its APIs, and has built a large ecosystem of tools and libraries around GraphQL. This has allowed Facebook to build APIs that are flexible and easy to use, and that support a wide range of clients, including its flagship social networking platform and its various mobile applications.

Another example of a company that has successfully used gRPC is Google. Google uses gRPC as the underlying communication framework for many of its internal systems, and has also built a large ecosystem of tools and libraries around gRPC. This has allowed Google to build highly performant and scalable systems that can handle a large amount of data and traffic, and that can support communication between systems written in different languages.

There are also many other companies and organizations that have successfully used either GraphQL or gRPC in their systems, including Airbnb, Dropbox, Netflix, and many others. These companies and organizations have used the respective technology to build APIs and other systems that are flexible, performant, and scalable, and that support a wide range of clients and use cases.

Main reasons to choose one over the other

In summary, GraphQL and gRPC are two different technologies that are used in software development to enable efficient communication between different systems. GraphQL is a query language and runtime system that is used to build and expose APIs, and is designed to provide flexible and hierarchical data access. gRPC is a remote procedure call (RPC) framework that is used to enable efficient communication between different systems, and is designed to support high performance and language-agnostic communication.

The decision of whether to use GraphQL or gRPC often depends on the specific requirements and goals of a project. Developers might choose to use GraphQL over gRPC for its ability to provide flexible and hierarchical data access, as well as its strong type system and support for schema definition and validation. On the other hand, developers might choose to use gRPC over GraphQL for its high performance and efficient use of bandwidth, as well as its support for language-agnostic communication and code generation.

Overall, the debate between GraphQL and gRPC is an ongoing one, and the decision of which technology to use will depend on the specific requirements and goals of a project. Both technologies have their own strengths and weaknesses, and are better suited to different use cases.

The debate will go on

The debate between GraphQL and gRPC is an ongoing one, and the future of these technologies in software development is likely to continue to evolve. As new technologies and approaches to building APIs and other types of systems emerge, it is possible that the relative strengths and weaknesses of GraphQL and gRPC will change, and that new technologies will emerge that provide different benefits and drawbacks compared to these two technologies.

One possible future direction for these technologies is the continued development of new tools and libraries that make it easier to use and integrate them into existing systems. For example, new code generation tools and libraries for GraphQL and gRPC could make it easier for developers to build and use APIs that are based on these technologies, and could also make it easier to integrate these APIs into existing systems.

Another possible future direction for these technologies is the development of new standards and best practices for using them in different types of systems. As more and more companies and organizations adopt GraphQL and gRPC, it is likely that new standards and best practices will emerge that will help to ensure the quality and consistency of APIs and other systems that are based on these technologies.

Overall, the debate between GraphQL and gRPC is likely to continue, and the future of these technologies in software development will depend on the specific requirements and goals of different projects, as well as the continued evolution of the technologies themselves.